Regular Soap Eliminates Bacteria and Viruses

Standard Soaps as Effective as Antibacterials in Preventing Illness

Aug 19, 2009 Jennifer Copley

Is antibacterial soap better than regular soap for eradicating germs? A study funded by the National Institutes of Health has provided the answer to this question.

Is it worth purchasing antibacterial soaps? Do they eliminate more germs? Are they more likely to prevent colds and flus? Mounting evidence indicates that antibacterials are no more effective than regular soaps at getting rid of germs and preventing illness.

Regular Soap Kills Viruses and Bacteria

The majority of frequently acquired infections, including the common cold, are caused by viruses rather than bacteria, so killing bacteria won’t prevent them. While bacteria are also responsible for a number of nasty infections, a large-scale study conducted by Larson et al. (2004) found that regular soaps are just as effective as antibacterial soaps in removing bacterial microbes.

The soap study involved 238 households (1,178 people) in New York, and was double-blinded, meaning that neither participants nor researchers knew which subjects were using which type of soap. Microbe cultures taken after hand washings found that both subjects using regular soap and those using antibacterial soap had significantly fewer microbes on their hands, but no differences were found between the two groups.

Regular Soap Is Equally Effective at Preventing Illness

A recent systematic review of 27 soap studies conducted by Aiello, Larson, and Levy (2007) found that antibacterial soaps were no more effective in preventing infectious illnesses or reducing bacteria levels on hands than regular soaps. Overall, it appears that antibacterials provide no additional health benefits.

According to Dr. Jean Weese of theAlabama Cooperative Extension System, regular soap is as effective as antibacterial soap because the germ-reducing function comes from removing microbe-infested substances from the skin rather than the soap’s antibacterial properties. For an antibacterial agent to provide additional benefits, the soap would have to remain on the skin for a prolonged length of time. In other words, it would have to be used like a lotion rather than rinsed away to provide sufficient time for the bacteria-killing agent to take effect.

Antibacterial Soaps May Contribute to the Development of Super Bugs

Scientists have raised concerns that an agent commonly used in antibacterial soaps called triclosan may encourage the rapid evolution of super bugs, bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics. The super bug theory is controversial, and not all experts agree that antibacterials pose a risk. However, of the 27 soap studies reviewed by Aiello et al., several provided evidence supporting the super bug theory.

Hand Washing with Soap and Water is the Best Defense Against Contagious Illnesses

Washing hands regularly is the best defense against microbes. Washing thoroughly with soap and water, particularly after touching surfaces in public places (such as stair rails) or engaging in physical contact (shaking hands) and before eating, will significantly reduce the risk of infection.

Soap and water are the most effective germ eradicators because they also remove surface dirt, but waterless alcohol-based antiseptic hand sanitizer products are also good germ killers when there is no water available.

Further Reading

For more on illness prevention and treatment, see When a Cold Is Most Contagious, Starve a Cold, Feed a Fever, and How Much Vitamin C Does the Body Need?

References:

• Aiello, A.E., Larson, E.L., & Levy, S.B. (2007). “Consumer Antibacterial Soaps: Effective or Just Risky?” Clinical Infectious Diseases, 45(Suppl. 2): S137-147.
• Infection Control Today. (13 February 2003). “NIH-Funded Study Says Antibacterial Soap No Better Than Regular Soap.” InfectionControlToday.com.
• Langcuster, J., Alabama Cooperative Extension System. (25 March 2004). “Antibacterial Soap: Useless and Maybe Even Self-Defeating, Expert Says.” ACES.edu.
• Larson, E.L., Lin, S.X., Gomez-Pichardo, C., Della-Latta, P. (2004). “Effect of Antibacterial Home Cleaning and Handwashing Products on Infectious Disease Symptoms: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.” Annals of Internal Medicine, 140(5): 321-329.
• Snyderman, N.L., MD. (2008). Medical Myths That Can Kill You: And the 101 Truths That Will Save, Extend, and Improve Your Life. New York: Crown Publishers.

The copyright of the article Regular Soap Eliminates Bacteria and Viruses in General Medicine is owned by Jennifer Copley. Permission to republish Regular Soap Eliminates Bacteria and Viruses in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Hand Washing Is the Best Defense Against Germs	Regular Soaps Are as Effective as Antibacterials	Many Illnesses Are Caused by Viruses, Not Bacteria
Regular Soap Is Effective In Removing Bacteria	Soaps Don't Kill Germs; They Wash Them Away

What do you think about this article?

---

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.

post your comment

What is 5+4?